**glossary**/

**Machine Learning Algorithm**

# Hierarchical Clustering

*LearnDataSci is reader-supported. When you purchase through links on our site, earned commissions help support our team of writers, researchers, and designers at no extra cost to you.*

## What is Hierarchical Clustering?

Hierarchical clustering is a popular method for grouping objects. It creates groups so that objects within a group are similar to each other and different from objects in other groups. Clusters are visually represented in a hierarchical tree called a *dendrogram*.

Hierarchical clustering has a couple of key benefits:

- There is no need to pre-specify the number of clusters. Instead, the dendrogram can be cut at the appropriate level to obtain the desired number of clusters.
- Data is easily summarized/organized into a hierarchy using dendrograms. Dendrograms make it easy to examine and interpret clusters.

## Applications

There are many real-life applications of Hierarchical clustering. They include:

- Bioinformatics: grouping animals according to their biological features to reconstruct phylogeny trees
- Business: dividing customers into segments or forming a hierarchy of employees based on salary.
- Image processing: grouping handwritten characters in text recognition based on the similarity of the character shapes.
- Information Retrieval: categorizing search results based on the query.

## Hierarchical clustering types

There are two main types of hierarchical clustering:

**Agglomerative**: Initially, each object is considered to be its own cluster. According to a particular procedure, the clusters are then merged step by step until a single cluster remains. At the end of the cluster merging process, a cluster containing all the elements will be formed.**Divisive**: The Divisive method is the opposite of the Agglomerative method. Initially, all objects are considered in a single cluster. Then the division process is performed step by step until each object forms a different cluster. The cluster division or splitting procedure is carried out according to some principles that maximum distance between neighboring objects in the cluster.

Between Agglomerative and Divisive clustering, Agglomerative clustering is generally the preferred method. The below example will focus on Agglomerative clustering algorithms because they are the most popular and easiest to implement.

## Hierarchical clustering steps

Hierarchical clustering employs a measure of distance/similarity to create new clusters. Steps for Agglomerative clustering can be summarized as follows:

- Step 1: Compute the proximity matrix using a particular distance metric
- Step 2: Each data point is assigned to a cluster
- Step 3: Merge the clusters based on a metric for the similarity between clusters
- Step 4: Update the distance matrix
- Step 5: Repeat Step 3 and Step 4 until only a single cluster remains

### Computing a proximity matrix

The first step of the algorithm is to create a distance matrix. The values of the matrix are calculated by applying a distance function between each pair of objects. The **Euclidean distance function** is commonly used for this operation. The structure of the proximity matrix will be as follows for a data set with $n$ elements. Here, $d(p_i, p_j)$ represent the distance values between $p_i$ and $p_j$.

$p_1$ | $p_2$ | $p_3$ | $...$ | $p_n$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

$p_1$ | $d(p_1,p_1)$ | $d(p_1,p_2)$ | $d(p_1,p_3)$ | $...$ | $d(p_1,p_n)$ |

$p_2$ | $d(p_2,p_1)$ | $d(p_2,p_2)$ | $d(p_2,p_3)$ | $...$ | $d(p_2,p_n)$ |

$p_3$ | $d(p_3,p_1)$ | $d(p_3,p_2)$ | $d(p_3,p_3)$ | $...$ | $d(p_3,p_n)$ |

$...$ | $...$ | $...$ | $...$ | $...$ | $...$ |

$p_n$ | $d(p_n,p_1)$ | $d(p_n,p_2)$ | $d(p_n,p_3)$ | $...$ | $d(p_n,p_n)$ |

### Similarity between Clusters

The main question in hierarchical clustering is how to calculate the distance between clusters and update the proximity matrix. There are many different approaches used to answer that question. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. The choice will depend on whether there is noise in the data set, whether the shape of the clusters is circular or not, and the density of the data points.

A numerical example will help illustrate the methods and choices. We'll use a small sample data set containing just nine two-dimensional points, displayed in Figure 1.

Suppose we have two clusters in the sample data set, as shown in Figure 2. There are different approaches to calculate the distance between the clusters. Popular methods are listed below.

#### Min (Single) Linkage

One way to measure the distance between clusters is to find the minimum distance between points in those clusters. That is, we can find the point in the first cluster nearest to a point in the other cluster and calculate the distance between those points. In Figure 2, the closest points are $p_2$ in one cluster and $p_5$ in the other. The distance between those points, and hence the distance between clusters, is found as $d(p_2, p_5) = 4$.

The advantage of the Min method is that it can accurately handle non-elliptical shapes. The disadvantages are that it is sensitive to noise and outliers.

#### Max (Complete) Linkage

Another way to measure the distance is to find the maximum distance between points in two clusters. We can find the points in each cluster that are furthest away from each other and calculate the distance between those points. In Figure 3, the maximum distance is between $p_1$ and $p_6$. Distance between those two points, and hence the distance between clusters, is found as $d(p_1, p_6) = 10$.

Max is less sensitive to noise and outliers in comparison to MIN method. However, MAX can break large clusters and tends to be biased towards globular clusters.

#### Centroid Linkage

The Centroid method defines the distance between clusters as being the distance between their centers/centroids. After calculating the centroid for each cluster, the distance between those centroids is computed using a distance function.

#### Average Linkage

The Average method defines the distance between clusters as the average pairwise distance among all pairs of points in the clusters. For simplicity, only some of the lines connecting pairs of points are shown in Figure 6.

#### Ward Linkage

The Ward approach analyzes the variance of the clusters rather than measuring distances directly, minimizing the variance between clusters.

With the Ward method, the distance between two clusters is related to how much the sum of squares (SS) value will increase when combined.

In other words, the Ward method attempts to minimize the sum of the squared distances of the points from the cluster centers. Compared to the distance-based measures described above, the Ward method is less susceptible to noise and outliers. Therefore, Ward's method is preferred more than others in clustering.

## Hierarchical Clustering with Python

In Python, the `Scipy`

and `Scikit-Learn`

libraries have defined functions for hierarchical clustering. The below examples use these library functions to illustrate hierarchical clustering in Python.

First, we'll import NumPy, matplotlib, and seaborn (for plot styling):

Next, we'll define a small sample data set:

Let's graph this data set as a scatter plot:

We'll now use this data set to perform hierarchical clustering.

### Hierarchical Clustering using Scipy

The Scipy library has the `linkage`

function for hierarchical (agglomerative) clustering.

The `linkage`

function has several methods available for calculating the distance between clusters: **single, average, weighted, centroid, median,** and **ward**. We will compare these methods below. For more details on the `linkage`

function, see the docs.

To draw the dendrogram, we'll use the `dendrogram`

function. Again, for more details of the `dendrogram`

function, see the docs.

First, we will import the required functions, and then we can form linkages with the various methods:

Now, by passing the `dendrogram`

function to matplotlib, we can view a plot of these linkages:

Notice that each distance method produces different linkages for the same data.

Finally, let's use the `fcluster`

function to find the clusters for the Ward linkage:

The `fcluster`

function gives the labels of clusters in the same index as the data set, `X1`

. For example, index one of `f1`

is `2`

, which is the cluster for the entry at index one of `X1`

, which is `[1, 1]`

.

### Hierarchical Clustering using Scikit-Learn

The Scikit-Learn library has its own function for agglomerative hierarchical clustering: `AgglomerativeClustering`

.

Options for calculating the distance between clusters include **ward, complete, average,** and **single**. For more specific information, you can find this class in the relevant docs

Using sklearn is slightly different than scipy. We need to import the `AgglomerativveClustering`

class, then instantiate it with the number of desired clusters and the distance (`linkage`

) function to use. Then, we use `fit_predict`

to train and predict the clusters using the `X1`

data set:

Again, here's a match up for each entry in `X1`

and its corresponding cluster:

The following code draws a scatter plot using the cluster labels.

Notice how the coloring of each point indicates how the data has been clustered into left and right regions.

## Clustering a real dataset

In the previous section, hierarchical clustering was performed on a simple data set. In the following section, hierarchical clustering will be performed on real-world data to solve a real problem.

Here, we use a dataset from the book Biostatistics with R, which contains information for nine different protein sources and their respective consumption from various countries. We'll use this data to group countries according to their protein consumption.

First, we'll read in the CSV and display the first few rows of data:

Country | RedMeat | WhiteMeat | Eggs | Milk | Fish | Cereals | Starch | Nuts | Fr.Veg | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0 | Albania | 10.1 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 42.3 | 0.6 | 5.5 | 1.7 |

1 | Austria | 8.9 | 14.0 | 4.3 | 19.9 | 2.1 | 28.0 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 4.3 |

2 | Belgium | 13.5 | 9.3 | 4.1 | 17.5 | 4.5 | 26.6 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 4.0 |

3 | Bulgaria | 7.8 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 8.3 | 1.2 | 56.7 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 4.2 |

4 | Czechoslovakia | 9.7 | 11.4 | 2.8 | 12.5 | 2.0 | 34.3 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 4.0 |

We'll first store the features for clustering in `X2`

, which are contained in all rows and columns from 1 to 10:

Again, we use the linkage function for clustering the data:

Finally, we can plot a dendrogram of the ward linkage clustering of 25 countries based on their protein consumption:

From the dendrogram, we can observe two distinct clusters colored green and yellow. This result indicates that countries in each cluster get their protein from similar sources.

Using the `fcluster`

function, we can find and add the cluster labels for each country to the data frame.

Country | RedMeat | WhiteMeat | Eggs | Milk | Fish | Cereals | Starch | Nuts | Fr.Veg | Clusters | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

0 | Albania | 10.1 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 42.3 | 0.6 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 2 |

1 | Austria | 8.9 | 14.0 | 4.3 | 19.9 | 2.1 | 28.0 | 3.6 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 1 |

2 | Belgium | 13.5 | 9.3 | 4.1 | 17.5 | 4.5 | 26.6 | 5.7 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 1 |

3 | Bulgaria | 7.8 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 8.3 | 1.2 | 56.7 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 2 |

4 | Czechoslovakia | 9.7 | 11.4 | 2.8 | 12.5 | 2.0 | 34.3 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 2 |

From here, we can utilize this clustering result to enhance other analyses we perform on the data.